UK bans pair over payments via Bermuda

Make text smaller Make text larger

  • Lengthy ban: two former executives of oil company Afren have been banned from running a UK company for 14 years

    Lengthy ban: two former executives of oil company Afren have been banned from running a UK company for 14 years


Two former oil company executives have each been banned from running companies for 14 years after they received millions of dollars in secret payments through a Bermudian-based entity they controlled.

Osman Shahenshah and Shahid Ullah were the ex-chief executive and ex-chief operating officer of Afren, an oil and gas company that collapsed into administration in 2015.

The two were charged with fraud and money laundering in September 2017 following a two-year investigation by the Serious Fraud Office over payments they received through secret companies they controlled relating to over $400 million of Nigeria business deals, City A.M. in the UK reported

Britain’s Insolvency Service said the disqualifications focused on Mr Shahenshah and Mr Ullah’s failure to declare to the Afren board that they had a vested interest in a number of high-value transactions.

Both transactions took place after Afren’s shareholders had capped what they deemed as “excessive” benefits packages for senior executives, it said.

The payments totalled about $17 million. Afren sacked both executives for gross misconduct.

The payments were made via special purpose vehicles based in the British Virgin Islands and Bermuda, which had been funded by an Afren partner company called Oriental Energy.

“Afren PLC’s shareholders had expressed clear opposition for a number of years to benefits packages for senior executives in their company, which they viewed to be excessive,” said David Brooks, group leader at the Insolvency Service.

“Mr Shahenshah and Mr Ullah have clearly then reacted to that decision by negotiating secret benefits for themselves.”

He added: “Their decision to agree an undisclosed contract via a BVI [British Virgin Islands] company, while receiving the funds via a Bermudian company of exactly the same name, best illustrates the cloak-and-dagger nature of their actions referred to in Chief Registrar Briggs’s judgment.”

The disqualification “underlines the gravity of directors breaching their fiduciary duties to a company and its shareholders”, Mr Brooks said.

The disqualifications prevent the two from either directly or indirectly becoming involved, without the permission from the court, in the promotion, formation or management of a company for the duration of their bans.

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Apr 16, 2018 at 8:00 am (Updated Apr 16, 2018 at 12:04 am)

UK bans pair over payments via Bermuda

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

  • Take Our Poll

    • "Who do you think will win the World Cup?"
    • Argentina
    • 5%
    • Belgium
    • 12%
    • Brazil
    • 20%
    • England
    • 16%
    • France
    • 6%
    • Germany
    • 9%
    • Portugal
    • 25%
    • Spain
    • 8%
    • Total Votes: 4375
    • Poll Archive

    Today's Obituaries